Ensuring Quality Care in the COVID-19 Era: Applying the Donabedian Model to Tertiary Wound Care Center Practices.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare, with its far-reaching effects seeping into chronic disease evaluation and treatment. Our tertiary wound care center was specially designed to deliver the highest quality care to wounded patients. Pre-pandemic, we were able to ensure rapid treatment via validated protocols delivered by a co-localized multidisciplinary team within the hospital setting. The pandemic has disrupted our model's framework, and we have worked to adapt our workflow without sacrificing quality of care. Using the modified Donabedian model of quality assessment, we present an analysis of pre- and intra-pandemic characteristics of our center. In this way, we hope other providers can use this framework for identifying evolving problems within their practice so that quality care can continue to be delivered to all patients.

Detrimental effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with adult extremity bone sarcoma: Reference center experience

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the healthcare system globally, including oncology. Which, in turn, led to significant delays in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. This work aims to evaluate COVID-19 impact on the treatment of bone sarcoma in adult patients based on experience in a single, high-volume institution. Method(s): We have analyzed the early local outcomes (i.e., the possibility of limb-sparing surgery) in all patients with primary bone tumours treated between 2016-01-28 and 2022-11-07 in Polish main sarcoma reference center. Patients treated in the 2016-2019 period were labelled as a "pre-pandemic" group, and patients treated in the 2020-2022 - "pandemic". Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used in the statistical analysis. Result(s): There were 302 eligible patients identified. The group characteristics are presented in the table. There were no differences in patient-related variables and histological subtypes of tumours between the two groups. The tumour size did not differ (p = 0.053), when all tumour grades were considered, but high-grade tumours were larger in the "pandemic" group (p = 0.034). This was reflected in the percentage of limb-sparing surgeries which dropped from 83.3% to 68.2% ("pre-pandemic" vs "pandemic", p = 0.004). This difference was even more evident in the case of high-grade tumors - 78% vs. 54%, respectively (p = 0.001). [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): To our knowledge, this is the first report of the long-lasting detrimental impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncologic treatment outcomes in adult patients with primary malignant bone tumors. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding(s): Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2023 European Society for Medical Oncology

Tackling diabetic foot: limb salvage during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Purpose: Lower extremity amputation resulting from diabetic foot ulcer, with neuropathic and/or ischemic etiologies, remains a devastating and costly complication of diabetes mellitus. This study evaluated changes in care delivery of diabetic foot ulcer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. A longitudinal assessment evaluating the ratio of major lower extremity amputation to minor lower extremity amputations after implementation of novel strategies to combat access restrictions was compared to the pre-COVID-19 era. Methods: The ratio of major to minor lower extremity amputation (i.e. the high-to-low ratio) was assessed at two academic institutions, the University of Michigan, and University of Southern California, in a population of patients with diabetes who had direct access to multidisciplinary foot care clinics in the 2 years prior to the pandemic and the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Patient characteristics and volumes including patients with diabetes and those with a diabetic foot ulcer were similar between eras. In addition, inpatient diabetic foot-related admissions were similar, but were suppressed by government shelter in placed mandates and subsequent COVID-19 variants surges (e.g. delta, omicron). In the control group, the Hi-Lo ratio increased every 6 months by an average of 11.8%. Meanwhile, following STRIDE implementation during the pandemic, the Hi-Lo ratio reduced by (-)11% (p < 0.001) and doubled limb salvage efforts as compared to the baseline era. The reduction of the Hi-Lo ratio was not influenced significant by patient volumes or inpatient admissions for foot infections. Conclusion: These findings signify the importance of podiatric care in the at-risk diabetic foot population. Through strategic planning and rapid implementation of at-risk diabetic foot ulcer triage, multidisciplinary teams were able to maintain accessible care during the pandemic which resulted in a reduction of amputations. Furthermore, this manuscript highlights the value of the Hi-Lo ratio as an indicator of institutional limb salvage efforts.

Acute Limb Ischemia among COVID-19 Patients in Hospital Kuala Lumpur

BACKGROUND: Acute arterial thromboembolism among the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) patients is worrying as it can result in significant thrombotic events. AIM: The research aimed to determine the clinical results of COVID-19-infected patients who had acute limb ischemia (ALI) during the COVID-19 epidemic. METHOD(S): ALI patients who had a positive COVID-19 were included in the observational cohort study, which was conducted at a single center. The primary outcomes were 30 days mortality, limb salvage, and successful revascularization. RESULT(S): From May to October 2021, data from 21 ALI subjects who had positive COVID-19 were analyzed. Of the 21 included subjects, 10 were male (48%). Their mean age was 65 +/- 5 years. In 9 subjects (42%), revascularization was done. Four (19%) of the 21 persons died while they were hospitalized. Twelve patients underwent major amputation, and among them, one patient died after a month of hospitalization for COVID-19-related pneumonia. Among the 12 patients that underwent amputation, 10 of them presented with ALI during the 1st week of COVID-19 illness. Only one patient developed acute limb ischemia despite being on heparin thromboprophylaxis. CONCLUSION(S): Despite attempts at revascularization, ALI associated with COVID-19 has high mortality and high rates of limb loss. In our experience, major amputation is required in up to a third of patients. This poor result appears to confirm that these infected individuals have a marked hypercoagulable condition. However, adhering to the treatment protocol of heparin thromboprophylaxis confers a benefit in this patient group. Copyright © 2022 Karthigesu Aimanan, Nurul Nadiah Nazurah Mohd Ali, Mohd Nurhisham Azmi Abdul Rahman, Putra Mas Pian, Kumaraguru V. K. Pillay, Firdaus Hayati, Hanif Hussein.

Outcomes of Patients With Acute Limb Ischemia in Patients With COVID-19: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

A systemic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of acute limb ischemia (ALI) in patients with and without coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) to determine the outcomes of ALI and compare the outcomes in patients with and without COVID-19 infection. A literature search of the Medline, Science Direct and Cochrane Library was performed from inception to July 15, 2021. Studies involving ALI in patients with COVID-19 were searched through three electronic databases. The endpoints include limb salvage, re-thrombosis, and mortality, and these outcomes were compared between patients with and without COVID-19 infection and type of management. The primary outcome was early limb salvage (till the patient was discharged from the hospital). The other outcomes assessed were re-thrombosis and mortality. These outcomes were compared between patients with and without COVID-19 infection and the type of management. Pooled estimates were presented as odds ratios (ORs) using a random or fixed effect model based on the results of the chi-square test and calculation of I2. Comparing the ALI outcomes in patients with and without COVID-19 infection, there was no significant difference in limb salvage rate (OR=0.26, 95% CI:0.02-3.09), but there was a significantly higher re-thrombosis (OR=2.65, 95% CI:1.34-5.23) and mortality rate (OR=4.71, 95% CI:1.11-19.99) in patients with COVID-19 infection. On comparing outcomes based on management, intervention group, and anticoagulant alone group, no significant difference was noted concerning limb salvage (OR=1.40, 95% CI:0.27-7.13) and mortality rates (OR=0.2, 95% CI:0.04-1.07). This meta-analysis demonstrates a higher re-thrombosis and mortality in ALI patients with COVID-19 infection when compared to patients without COVID-19 but with similar limb salvage.

Early experience with venous arterialization for limb salvage in no-option patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with adverse limb outcomes and increased mortality. However, a small subset of the CLTI population will have no feasible conventional methods of revascularization. In such cases, venous arterialization (VA) could provide an alternative for limb salvage. The objective of the present study was to review the outcomes of VA at our institution. METHODS: We performed a single-institution review of 41 patients who had been followed up prospectively and had undergone either superficial or deep VA. The data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, VA technique (endovascular vs hybrid), and WIfI (wound, ischemia, and foot infection) limb staging. Data were collected at 1-month, 6-month, and 1-year intervals and included the following outcomes: patency, wound healing, major adverse limb events, major amputation, and death. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. RESULTS: The study group included 41 patients who had undergone successful open hybrid superficial or deep endovascular VA; 21 (51.2%) had undergone a purely endovascular procedure and 20 (48.8%), hybrid VA. The WIfI clinical stage was as follows: stage 4, 33 (80.5%); stage 3, 6 (14.6%); and stage 2, 1 (2.4%). Of the 41 patients, 24 (58.5%) had completed follow-up at 6 months and 16 (39%) at 1 year. At 1 year, the VA primary patency was 28.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15%-0.43%), primary assisted patency was 44.3% (95% CI, 0.27%-0.60%), and secondary patency was 67% (95% CI, 0.49%-0.80%). The complete wound healing rate was 2.7% (n = 1) at 1 month, 62.5% (n = 15) at 6 months, and 18.8% (n = 3) at 1 year. Overall wound healing at 1 year was 46.3% (n = 19). The number of major adverse limb events at 1 year was 15 (36.5%) and included 8 reinterventions (19.5%) and 7 major amputations (17%). The number of deaths was zero (0%) at 1 month and four (19%) at 6 months. Two deaths (9.5%) were attributed to COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). No further deaths had occurred within 1 year. The limb salvage survival probability at 1 year was 81%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that for a select subset of CLTI patients presenting with a high WIfI clinical limb stage and no viable options for conventional open or endovascular arterial revascularization, superficial and deep VA are feasible options to achieve limb salvage.

Venous gangrene associated with COVID-19: Successful limb preservation strategies with optimal wound management.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, high rates of arterial and venous thromboembolic (VTE) events were noted in association with increased rates of major amputation. VTE appears to be a significant source of morbidity and mortality for this patient population and numerous methods have been described to achieve limb salvage. Nevertheless, best management remains unclear. We describe the case of a 60-year-old male with severe venous gangrene secondary to a non-occlusive mid-femoral and occlusive infrapopliteal deep venous thromboses associated with COVID-19 infection who ultimately underwent meticulous local wound care and transmetatarsal amputation, which allowed for maximal preservation of foot function and limb salvage.

Severe arterial thromboembolism associated with COVID-19 infection

Purpose: The purpose of our report is to present two patients with acute peripheral arterial thrombosis as a result of COVID-19 infection and discuss the unique features of arterial thrombosis in patients suffering from COVID-19. Case Report: We present a 66-year-old female and a 53-year-old male with proven COVID-19 infection who developed acute lower limb ischemia. Common features in both patients were a multi-segment arterial occlusion in previously healthy arteries, developing despite prophylactic anticoagulation about 15 days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. Limb salvage was achieved by early diagnosis and expedited thrombectomy. Conclusion: COVID-19 associated arterial thromboembolism has several unique features reflecting the underlying pathogenetic mechanism which involves a combination of coagulopathy and endothelial dysfunction. Clinical vigilance allowing early diagnosis and expedited surgery remains the key to a successful outcome.

Hospitalization rate and treatment strategy for critical limb ischemia in south Sardinia during COVID-19

BACKGROUND: The year 2020 was characterized by COVID-19 pandemic with a consequent profound change in health systems and difficulties in accessing care for patients suffering from chronic diseases other than COVID-19, including critical limb ischemia (CH). The main purpose of this study was to verify whether the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a reduction in the hospital admission rate to the vascular surgeries of southern Sardinia and an increase in major amputations rate in patients suffering from CLI. METHODS: In our retrospective multicenter study, data of patients were analyzed using two different time frames for comparison: the year before Italian lockdown (P1) and the first year of pandemic (P2). Primary outcome was the rate of CLI-related hospitalization in the two period. Secondary outcomes were medical treatment, revascularization, and primary amputation rates. RESULTS: A total of 137 and 140 patients were admitted for CLI in the study centers during P1 and P2 respectively, with a comparable monthly hospitalization rate in the two periods (IRR 0.98;CI: 0.77-1.25;P=0.86). The median age was 76 years in P1 and 71 years in P2 (P=0.09);the two cohorts were comparable for demographical characteristics and risk factors. Patients treated medically in PI were 14% vs. 9% in P2 (P-0.298), 64% of patients underwent urgent revascularization in P1 vs. 70% in P2 (P=0.61) and 22% underwent primary amputation in P1 vs. 19% in P2 (P=0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed no significant differences in CLI-related hospitalization and in-hospital amputation rate between P1 and P2 in Southern Sardinia.

Critical limb ischaemia in the time of COVID-19: establishing ambulatory service provision.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic enforced changes to healthcare services at a pace and extent not seen previously in the NHS. The Royal Devon and Exeter provides regional vascular surgery services. A consultant-led urgent 'hot clinic' was established, providing patients with ambulatory care. We aim to describe the service for critical limb ischaemia (CLI) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and evaluate this against recommended best practice. METHODS: Retrospective review of electronic databases and records of patients with CLI during a non-COVID vs COVID-19 period. Primary outcome measures were those established by guidance from the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland. RESULTS: Non-COVID vs COVID-19: total patients n=97 vs 96, of which CLI patients n=29 vs 21. Median length of stay 15 vs 0 days (p<0.001); median time from referral to specialist review 0 vs 3 days (p<0.001); multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT) recorded 3% vs 29%; median time to intervention 6 vs 8 days; conservative management 52% vs 67%; endovascular 28% vs 10%; open surgery 21% vs 24%; 30-day survival 79% vs 76%. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 imposed a major change to the service for patients with CLI with a focus on ambulatory care pathways for diagnosis and intervention. We observe a significant reduction in overall length of stay with no clinically significant change in time to consultant review, time to imaging, overall management strategy or outcomes. The results of this study show that patients with CLI can be managed safely and effectively on an ambulatory basis in accordance with established best practice.

Misdiagnosed Acute Limb Ischemia in Three Nonhospitalized Patients Recovering From a Nonsevere COVID-19 Infection.

The incidence of venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients is significant. The vast majority of COVID-19 patients spend their quarantine at home in a self-isolation condition. The occurrence of Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a dangerous event that needs prompt diagnosis and management with time-dependent recanalization outcomes. We present a case series of three COVID-19 patients who suffered from ALI that occurred during home self-isolation, and that were diagnosed and treated with a significant time-delay due to COVID-19 social implications.

Upper-Extremity Phlegmasia Cerulea Dolens With Compartment Syndrome in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Sepsis.

A 54-year-old woman with leukemia presented with coronavirus disease 2019 and a right upper-extremity indwelling peripherally inserted central catheter line for chemotherapy administration. On hospital admission day 9, she developed acute right upper-extremity edema and pain. Ultrasound demonstrated complete superficial and deep venous thrombosis up to the proximal subclavian vein. Her examination result was consistent with acute phlegmasia cerulea dolens and compartment syndrome, but respiratory instability prevented transfer and vascular surgery intervention. Instead, we performed bedside fasciotomies and administered therapeutic heparin, and the limb was salvaged. This case underscores the potential for successful limb salvage in patients with phlegmasia in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 via compartment release and therapeutic anticoagulation.

Acute thrombotic manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 infection: Experience at a large New York City health care system.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a novel coronavirus that has typically resulted in upper respiratory symptoms. However, we have encountered acute arterial and venous thrombotic events after COVID-19 infection. Managing acute thrombotic events from the novel virus has presented unprecedented challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. In our study, we have highlighted the unique treatment required for these patients and discussed the role of anticoagulation for patients diagnosed with COVID-19. METHODS: The data from 21 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 disease and acute venous or arterial thrombosis were collected. The demographics, comorbidities, home medications, laboratory markers, and outcomes were analyzed. The primary postoperative outcome of interest was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were primary patency and morbidity. To assess for significance, a univariate analysis was performed using the Pearson χ2 and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and the Student t test for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients with acute thrombotic events met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most cases were acute arterial events (76.2%), with the remainder venous cases (23.8%). The average age for all patients was 64.6 years, and 52.4% were male. The most prevalent comorbidity in the group was hypertension (81.0%). Several markers were markedly abnormal in both arterial and venous cases, including an elevated neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (8.8) and D-dimer level (4.9 µg/mL). Operative intervention included percutaneous angiography in 25.00% of patients and open surgical embolectomy in 23.8%. Most of the patients who had undergone arterial intervention had developed a postoperative complication (53.9%) compared with a 0% complication rate after venous interventions. Acute kidney injury on admission was a factor in 75.0% of those who died vs 18.2% in the survivors (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: We have described our experience in the epicenter of the pandemic of 21 patients who had experienced major thrombotic events from infection with COVID-19. The findings from our cohort have highlighted the need for increased awareness of the vascular manifestations of COVID-19 and the important role of anticoagulation for these patients. More data are urgently needed to optimize treatment and prevent further vascular complications of COVID-19 infections.

Imprint Cytology for Intra-operative Assessment of Surgical Margins for Skeletal Tumours in COVID-19 Pandemic.

In the current COVID-19 pandemic, tremendous pressure is been exerted on the existing health infrastructure of many developing nations. Limb salvage surgeries in bone and soft tissue sarcomas cannot be delayed beyond a certain time-period and constitute an orthopaedic emergency in certain situations. Evaluation of intra-operative surgical margins forms an important step especially in cases with planned close margins or intercalary resections. Techniques such as imprint cytology can be preferred over frozen sections for evaluation of the surgical margins especially in COVID-19 positive patients. The advantages it offers such as completion of the procedure within the operation room complex, no generation of aerosols, and almost equal sensitivity and specificity when compared with frozen section method do warrant a modification of current surgical practice in the current health crisis especially in resource-constrained nations. Awareness and better communication regarding the same from the pathologist to the surgical team will go a long way in conserving resources and avoid unnecessary exposure to potentially infected aerosols.